Nastich Law

When I requested with the State Bar of California for a mandatory fee arbitration Summer L. Nastich was the arbitrator who agreed to hear my case. I was disputing the fees that my retrial attorney charged me without my authorization. Since there was no stenographer present at the hearing Nastich wore that hat as a poor substitute who required that we speak slowly so she could write down as each of us took turns speaking. This is a task Nastich should not handle as I discovered incorrect statements noted on her Arbitration Findings. It states, "This dispute is about three distinct items for which Attorney advanced costs and then deducted the amounts from Client's recovery" and the second time it's quoted as a crucial issue "under a contingency fee arrangement in which the Attorney advances

I would not recommend this attorney. I used this attorney for Arbitration and she apparently did not read the facts. To make a long story short. I used a Contractor who did not use the city approved blueprints and I was found to be in the wrong. The Contractor should have known to use the original blureprint since he was a veteran Contractor. The Contractor requested a copy of a blueprint which was sent to him. The next day I picked up a 11 by 17 blueprint from the engineer and took it to the City for approval. It took me approximately 9 days before it was approved and I was found to be In the wrong for having both blueprints in my possession. I must add the Contractor was offered the City blueprint before he began the job and declined, related he would use the blueprint draft he printed o