Sangiovanni & Ahn

Don't do it. Just got charged 14 hours for "reviewing 165 emails" (no attachments; simple emails). This comes after years of such billing on the back end of my divorce. He sent several follow ups when I didn't authorize him to charge my credit card immediately- all within 30 days.

Peter Sangiovanni did NOT do his due diligence with contacting people that knew my child best, nor did he listen to what my child had to say or felt. Rarely did he respond to my emails, yet he responded to my ex-husband as well as his attorney regularly. In my opinion, Peter Sangiovanni does NOT know how to be objective and put the child he is appointed GAL to first. Seems to care more about money and taking the Easy Way out rather than putting in the time and effort to do what is Right. I feel that Peter Sangiovanni did not get justice for my child, and in my opinion, he committed legal malpractice as he clearly did NOT perform the required duties that a reputable GAL would have. Do yourself and your child(ren) an enormous favor and stay away from retaining Peter Sangiovanni as GAL to re

Peter is not only a fantastic lawyer but an excellent guardian. He is extremely fair and diplomatic. There were times during the process I may have no agreed with something that was decided on, but Peter explained the rational and helped me understand the law. Peter is one of the most honest and fair lawyers I've ever worked with. You can tell he is highly respected for this very reason.

Peter Sangiovanni was appointed as the guardian ad litem to my child, and this review is not written out of spite, but simply to inform those that read of the negligence that can be attributed to Peter's handling of family court matter and why to avoid having him assigned to your case at all costs. Peter Sangiovanni was in violation of numerous administrative orders while assigned to my case and a report was filed against him to David Curtain of the Disciplinary Counsel. Peter, having been considered an agent of the court, leaned on his relationship with the judge to seek refuge from the complaint. Peter bills for every single text, email, call, and other forms of correspondence and he has no issue charging premium rates for "reading" material that he does not use when he formulates an opi

Peter was assigned as guardian ad litem for my child’s custody case. I took her Mother to court as she was trying to move my daughter 2.5 hours away and two states away to ruin my daughters relationship with me. I provided many facts and examples of past attempts of this nature. Common friends who she threatened if they were to talk to me, spoke with Peter and described her attempts of this. Including the mother’s. I was able to keep my child in the same school system for stability as she had just settled in the previous year and was thriving. Peter ignored anything that came from my side and simply choose the outcome based on sex. And claimed that Mother’s are more important than fathers. Which is sexist and untrue. All childhood psychology research recommends consistency as the primary